Coque samsung a5 2017 guess Sloppy report depicts Apple as struggling with LG as an alternative to S-coque samsung chat 335 amazon-ugwreh

Sloppy report depicts coque huawei p30 lite jaune et noir Apple as struggling with LG as an alternative to Samsung OLEDs on new iPhones A new report claiming to understand Apple’s supply chain has asserted that LG screens might be facing development issues as a coque samsung galaxy s 3 second source for OLED displays on upcoming iPhones, based on Apple’s higher than normal scrutiny of LG prototypes and then strangely claims this issue etui coque samsung a3 is driving iPhone X prices so high that “some” are not buying it. iPhone X shipped with an OLED display from a single source The Wall Street Journal report, with a byline of Yoko Kubota in Beijing and Takashi Mochizuki in Tokyo, and additional credit for amazon coque samsung s4 mini Tripp Mickle in San Francisco (who recently bizarrely claimed iPhone X was selling poorly based on a fundamental lack of understanding of the phone industry and Apple’s supply chain) described Apple’s efforts to develop a second source for coque samsung s5 personnaliser OLED screens (apart from its current sole supplier Samsung) as both coque samsung galaxy core prime lte a “struggle” and the reason why iPhone X carries a premium price. A report mixing reality with fantasy LG’s inability to match Samsung in OLED competency is well known. Last coque samsung galaxy s4 mini strass fall, Google shipped two Pixel 2 models, one from HTC with a Samsung display and the other from LG coque samsung galaxy y personnalisable with an LG display. goed hoesje Both had serious OLED screen issues, but the LG “XL” model was shockingly bad. Google coque huawei p30 lite cat shipped it anyway. Sales of both models coque p30 huawei sailor moon were terrible. Nobody coque samsung g7 in the amazone coque samsung galaxy core prime media seemed to care, and if anything, made excuses for Google which shipped a faulty, inferior product with a high price tag. But now that Apple is investigating LG as a potential OLED coque samsung galaxy s5 2016 supplier, LG’s inability to master OLED displays coque samsung a5 original on the same level as Samsung has been recast as a big issue for iPhones despite the fact that Apple already coque samsung j5 2017 or shipped coque samsung galaxy s7 transparente iPhone X to great success using just one OLED supplier to ensure high quality output. coque huawei According to the report, LG was supposedly tasked coque samsung j 7 with building displays for about 20 percent of future iPhone models, with Samsung being relied upon for the other 80 percent. coque huawei In reality, Apple constantly makes changes to coque samsung galaxy s5 swag its suppliers based on cost, capacity and competence, and in tandem coque samsung galaxy grand prime guess with changes in demand across different regions globally. Rumors of a supply cut with one supplier can not be accurately interpreted, as a history of false predictions by channel check coque huawei p30 classe analysts have demonstrated across the last decade. Samsung’s component expense blown out of proportion The report also stated that Apple’s single source for OLED coque huawei p30 lite dure screens would logically give Samsung higher pricing power, another obvious fact that has played out in other areas, including memory and other components where Samsung holds pricing power due to a lack of strong competition. However, it also went out on a limb in stating that Samsung’s control of the OLED market was “one reason for the iPhone X’s steep $999 price tag, analysts said,” before adding original conjecture that, “the price turned off some customers, causing demand to fall short of expectations and forcing Apple to cut orders for parts.” Pitty the troubles of iPhone X in trying to find buyers That conclusion is based entirely on the media narrative that claims Apple expected to build 40 million more iPhone X units in the March quarter than it did, a wildly implausible idea that Japan’s Nikkei and the Wall Street Journal kept passing back and forth as the reason why iPhone X was selling “so poorly,” even as the new model gobbled up over a third of all profits as the best selling smartphone model. Both sites (and everyone copying their lede) also claimed that iPhone X’s high price was hurting sales, despite the fact coque huawei p30 lite flower that demand for the new model (and the also expensive iPhone 8) dramatically pushed up Apple’s iPhone Average Selling Price. If a statically important number of buyers were against paying any premium for the new models, the ASP would obviously not have changed. That’s just how math works. Claiming the opposite is just a lie. BOM component estimates are nearly worthless A reliable, competitive second supplier for iPhone quality OLED panels would certainly help Apple bargain for better component prices. But the report takes external parts estimates as fact, coque samsung a3 2016 transparente despite a history of warnings from Apple executives that those third party figures are just ballpark guesswork, and are generally far lower than the actual component costs involved. The Wall Street Journal report claimed that iPhone X’s OLED display accounted for “about $97 out of $376 in total estimated cost per device,” based on a parts breakdown report. That display cost would indeed be significantly higher than estimated costs of previous LCD screens, which Apple sources from multiple suppliers. Display estimates for iPhone 7 and 8 models have suggested an LCD component cost closer to $50. coque huawei Yet the screens’ cost ratio to the entire iPhone BOM was only coque samsung galaxy s1 i9000 a few percentage points different. coque huawei And even a nearly $50 difference component cost for the display would only result in a retail price difference of about twice that much, or around $100 of the final price.

Related posts:

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment